Big Data News Hubb
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Big Data
  • News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Big Data
  • News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
Big Data News Hubb
No Result
View All Result
Home Big Data

Forecasting AI Compliance at the State, Federal, and International Levels

admin by admin
February 19, 2023
in Big Data


In this special guest feature, Kim Peretti, Alston & Bird partner and co-leader of the firm’s National Security & Digital Crimes and Privacy, Cyber & Data Strategy teams, suggests that given the vast amounts of data that goes into artificial intelligence, it’s no surprise that data protection laws are on the vanguard of regulating AI. Peretti tracks the legal implications of AI in her role at Alston & Bird. The ways data protection laws regulate AI is top-of-mind for her, having recently spoken on the topic at the ABA Science & Technology Law Section’s 2002 AI & Robotics National Institute.

2023 promises to usher in a new wave of immediate AI obligations for organizations as various new state privacy laws impose GDPR-level requirements around automated decision-making, one of the most common AI applications. Organizations, however, should also begin considering the impacts of recently enacted and pending international and U.S. federal AI regulatory developments. For example, China’s new regulation governing companies’ use of algorithms in online recommendation systems took effect in March 2022, and requires that companies be transparent about the purposes of an algorithm, adhere to mainstream value orientations, and actively prevent the dissemination of harmful or illegal information. The regulation further imposes notice and opt out requirements when AI is used to target users and prohibits the use of algorithms that use personal data to offer different prices to consumers. In Europe, the proposed AI Act, which was first presented by the Commission in 2021, would build on these themes through a comprehensive AI framework that brings structure to an opaque regulatory landscape by developing a risk-based approach. We expect these regulations to set the stage for how global companies integrate AI moving forward.

In the U.S., we saw a glimpse of the FTC’s enforcement priorities over AI when the FTC issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) on August 22, 2022, requesting public comment on whether new rules are needed to address the harms resulting from commercial surveillance and lax data security practices. The ANPR marks an intentional shift toward a more holistic regulatory framework that addresses algorithmic error, deception, data manipulation, and other abuses. The FTC acknowledged that its current enforcement approach may not be enough to combat these abuses without affirmative rulemaking. While it is difficult to predict what these new rules will look like, the FTC will clearly be exploring rulemaking possibilities from all angles. This may include a set of standards to safeguard against algorithmic error, new rules to govern corporate surveillance, and granular disclosure requirements regarding AI mechanics and socioeconomic impact. The ANPR further suggests that automated decision-making and profiling activities may be completely prohibited in certain industries and ponders whether other federal agencies should be included in developing a comprehensive framework. 

While the regulatory approaches vary at the state, federal, and national level, there are common themes found throughout all approaches that can guide compliance efforts. Companies that develop, deploy, or use AI systems should: (1) assess their current and future AI dependencies and craft policies that govern dataset integrity, accuracy, transparency, foreseeable risks, and social impacts, with appropriate monitoring in place to ensure AI systems do not lead to disparate and unfair outcomes; (2) develop a firm understanding of the AI system’s mechanics and be prepared to provide detailed explanations to regulator and consumer inquiries regarding the logic involved; and (3) determine whether more traditional processes would be a better approach to AI after performing a cost-benefit analysis. 

Sign up for the free insideBIGDATA newsletter.

Join us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/InsideBigData1

Join us on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/insidebigdata/

Join us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/insideBIGDATANOW





Source link

Previous Post

Automate replication of relational sources into a transactional data lake with Apache Iceberg and AWS Glue

Next Post

Why Replicating HBase Data Using Replication Manager is the Best Choice

Next Post

Why Replicating HBase Data Using Replication Manager is the Best Choice

Recommended

6 Reasons Why Flutter is Better than Any other Cross-Platform SDK

November 23, 2022

MLOps at Walgreens Boots Alliance With Databricks Lakehouse Platform

December 5, 2022

8 Reasons Why YipitData Migrated From Apache Airflow to Databricks Workflows

December 7, 2022

Don't miss it

News

Bill Gates Says the Age of AI Has Begun, Bringing Opportunity and Responsibility

March 25, 2023
Big Data

Techniques for training large neural networks

March 25, 2023
Big Data

O’Reilly 2023 Tech Trends Report Reveals Growing Interest in Artificial Intelligence Topics, Driven by Generative AI Advancement

March 24, 2023
Big Data

Democratizing the magic of ChatGPT with open models

March 24, 2023
News

Introducing native support for Apache Hudi, Delta Lake, and Apache Iceberg on AWS Glue for Apache Spark, Part 2: AWS Glue Studio Visual Editor

March 24, 2023
News

ChatGPT Puts AI At Inflection Point, Nvidia CEO Huang Says

March 24, 2023

big-data-footer-white

© 2022 Big Data News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Big Data
  • News
  • Contact us

Newsletter Sign Up

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Big Data
  • News
  • Contact us

© 2022 Big Data News Hubb All rights reserved.